![]() However, this would have been an issue if the word “CARE” was being used alone. “CARE” is a term representing public welfare and hence cannot be used by any business. Besides being a registered word mark, EYETEX also owned a device mark with an artistic drawing of a lady’s eye.Ĥ.Praba’s V Care Clinic and I-care Clinic LEX and TEX are quite similar and, since they are being used by two different brands, they might be misleading for the buyers. The defendant used LEX, while the plaintiff used TEX. In words EYLEX and EYETEX, EYE is the word common to both. Besides similar wordmarks, the dispute concerns a three-ringed device mark with similarity in shape and configuration. The defendant used Spacewalker, while the Plaintiff has the word mark Starwalker registered for itself. Wordmarks “Spacewalker” and “Starwalker” can probably confuse the minds of the general public. ![]() Montblanc and New Delhi Stationery Mart.According to Plaintiff, they use the terms Ayur and Ayu in manufacturing and selling essential oils, hair lotions, cosmetics, and shampoos. ![]() Such clashing of interests is relatively common in the business world. The plaintiff complains that the defendant has applied to register the following terms: According to the plaintiff, they have exclusive rights due to the registration of both terms Ayur and Ayu. The case involving the terms Ayur and Ayuīoth terms appear similar and connected to the word Ayurveda which is a system of traditional Indian medicine. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |